Business Loans For Minorities: Get A Good Rate
By
Business loans are not always easy loans to get, and minorities may find this even more difficult. Many communities and government agencies have created programs to help minorities obtain a small business loan when they need it, but there is still a lengthy process to go through before the small business loan for the minority can be approved. Minority business entrepreneurs must submit a series of loan application materials, get a background check, credit check, and also submit a reliable and cohesive business plan.
The most important thing to get a good rate is to have a strong credit history. Without a high credit score, most lenders are required to only offer specific programs. Some banks and financial institutions may extend higher rates for low credit scores, poor credit history, or bad credit overall. If this is the case, it will be harder for minorities to obtain a business loan with a good rate.
The Minority Business Development Agency helps minorities by providing training and information. This can include loan and grant applications, minority businesses in the area that can provide referrals and even banks that work exclusively with minority businesses to create a custom loan program.
A mentoring service by the National Minority Council helps people receive special contracts through local lenders. Many local lenders work from referrals, and have access to funds where they can offer a lower rate. It’s important for minority business entrepreneurs to network as much as possible. Networking helps people learn about other businesses, and there may be outside investors who are available to extend funding at lower rates than even banks or commercial institutions.
The legal work behind many minority businesses is what can hold up the loan application process. The more well-prepared and ready the minority business owner can be with all documents, financial information, and records, the more likely it is that banks and other lending institutions will want to work with them. Banks can offer various programs that are tailored for certain business needs.
Referrals from key community members can increase the chances of obtaining a minority business loan, and possibly getting a good rate. Another way to reduce a rate is to break up the loan into two separate loans, and use different assets or collateral for each one. Some banks can help with arranging this.
Financial assistance may also be offered by the Small Business Administration. Corporations can help minority business owners. Corporations can assist with the loan, or extend some corporate loan package benefits that are competitive or lower than standard market rates. These corporations may work as sponsors for the loan, and can help the business promote itself within in the community as well.
Minority businesses can get good rates from a variety of resources. Community assistance programs can help pull together the financial plans and business planning specifications, while banks can offer strong rates when there is a strong credit history. Making sure credit scores are accurate can help business owners get a good rate right away. Still, there are plenty of options for assistance from other resources as well.
Louise Michaels
http://www.articlesbase.com/finance-articles/business-loans-for-minorities-get-a-good-rate-101286.html
7 Comments
April 26th, 2010 at 9:51 pm
Who is really behind the sub-prime mortgage bailout,?
If you thought Hillary Clinton’s government takeover plan for health care was bad, wait ‘til you see what she has in store for the housing sector. As always with the Clintons, the market is the problem and Big Nanny is the solution. Unfortunately for taxpayers, Hillary has bipartisan company in the Bush administration on this issue. Their election season prescription? Rewarding bad behavior. Punishing responsible behavior. Doing more harm than good.
In case you’ve been living in a cave, there’s a painful credit crunch underway. The culprit is the subprime mortgage — a species of risky home loans to buyers with dubious credit and income. Cash-rich lenders doled out the subprimes hoping rising home prices would compensate for any failed bets. But when housing prices started plummeting and interest rates began rising, many borrowers started defaulting. Insolvency looms for countless lenders.
Instead of letting lenders and subprime mortgage-holders suffer the consequences of their actions, politicians and grievance-mongers are riding to the supposed rescue. In a supreme irony, the very same champions of the needy in the Democrat party who complain constantly about the lack of “affordable housing” are now fighting tooth and nail to keep housing prices high.
To “cure” the housing crisis, Hillary wants a 90-day moratorium on foreclosures for homeowners who default on subprimes. In addition, she wants a five-year freeze on the monthly rate for subprime adjustable mortgages. While she demonizes lenders as predatory out of one side of her mouth, the other side of her mouth is floating legislation to protect lenders from lawsuits and let them convert certain mortgages into “stable, affordable loans.” On top of all that federal meddling, she proposes a $5 billion — yes, that’s “billion” with a “b” — fund to “help communities suffering from high rates of foreclosures.”
Jesse Jackson is also stirring the pot. With subprime victim sob stories flooding the news and anecdotes of minority homeowners in trouble, there’s no way the shakedown king could stay away. But the subprime mess isn’t a result of ruthless racial discrimination. If anything, it’s the result of too little discrimination by lenders too willing and eager to sign on people who had no business taking on mortgages. (And you know Jesse Jackson would be screaming either way. The lenders are damned if they lend and damned if they don’t.)
Let’s boil this down to fundamentals: Why should the rest of us have to shoulder the burden because some buyers made poor choices, overextended themselves, and bought more house than they could afford? Why should other business owners bear the costs of lenders’ failed bets? And why are falling home prices such a catastrophe to be “fixed” in the first place? Sacramento Bee columnist Daniel Weintraub put it well: “It is great news when the price of energy, food, transportation, health care and consumer electronics drops. But for some reason it is bad news when the price of shelter drops. . . . Shouldn’t we be seeing stories filled with anecdotes about formerly priced-out middle-income families finally getting their chance at the American Dream?”
There’s another side of the housing crunch equation that’s not making it onto the newspaper front pages and presidential campaign websites. “For every house sold because the buyer couldn’t make the payments,” Weintraub notes, “there is a buyer on the other end of that transaction who got a good deal. And for every foreclosure, there are probably 10 buyers of nearby homes who benefited from the general easing of house-price pressure.” Bingo.
Fiscal conservatives ought to be balking at HillaryCare for housing. But President Bush’s treasury secretary, Hank Paulson, is singing a similar tune. He proposed a new safety net to stem the tide of home foreclosures through a bailout plan for homeowners with bad credit scores. They’d be eligible for relief from paying hundreds of dollars in additional monthly payments when their mortgage rates reset. Those who have been responsible enough to maintain good credit, however, will be out of luck. In addition, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has proposed that government-sponsored mortgage enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac be allowed to raise their loan limits and have their debt explicitly guaranteed by the public dole.
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are colluding to protect the reckless and keep home prices high on the backs of prudent taxpayers. Who’ll bail us out from this perversion of the American Dream?
April 27th, 2010 at 2:53 am
Have you thought of the costs if we don’t do a damn thing about it?
I am NOT endorsing any certain plan, but action is needed to correct this and prevent it from happening again.
References :
April 27th, 2010 at 2:55 am
Well defaulting on loans helps no one. All those people would be homeless and that will cost the taxpayers billions too. The only thing to do is to freeze the rates and allow the homeowners time to repair their financial woes. I hate the idea as much as the next republican, but in light of what has happened freezing the loans is like closing the gate after most of the cows got out. A little help but should have never opened the gate in the first place.
References :
April 27th, 2010 at 2:57 am
I could not agree with you more. i think the Mortgage companies should be held responsible along with the Governments permission to do what they did. It certainly is not our responsibility. I make my Mortgage payments without a problem but i can read!!.
References :
April 27th, 2010 at 2:59 am
Hillary wah wah Hillary wah wah
Isn’t George W Bush the one who actually DID IT ?
References :
April 27th, 2010 at 3:01 am
Hate to break this to ‘ya, but Bush is bailing out subprime borrowers (gasp) by requiring a freeze on the interest rates of some adjustable mortgages. Check out the AP news and you’ll see.
References :
April 27th, 2010 at 3:03 am
LOL you are blaming Clinton???
Remember who bailed out the banks in the 1980′s for all their scams — REGEAN. Look who is bailing them out now — BUSH.
National health care, no matter what you think, atleast was about giving every American a basic need – proper medical care no matter what your situation.
Protecting people who literaly had no right to purchase a home because of their economic standing, and the predatory lenders who preyed on them is a real stab in the back to every American. Don’t blame Clinton for mistake of greedy bankers and people who were trying – errantly – to live the "American Dream"
References :